|
With the lesson we
have heard today, it is a good guess that the subject is
stewardship.
Yes, I know that we
had our Consecration Sunday more than a month ago, but what we
need to hear today is something that cannot be paid off with an
entire stack of commitment cards, as necessary as they are.
We need to think
carefully about what lies behind all of this commitment
and giving, namely, our attitudes.
and then behind even
our attitudes to what actions of Our Lord Jesus Christ make it
possible for us to do and to give.
What Jesus commends
about that unnamed woman in the Temple is not just the gift of
the 2 cents, it is the attitude of the woman in utter dependence
on God,
and in thanksgiving
for all of his gifts, including the tiny handful of things
entrusted to her care.
It is the attitude
of thankfulness which catches Jesus' attention and her
trust which brings Christ to speak.
What is the source
and origin of her thanks?
Why does it come to
dominate her life?
Most of the time we
would try to answer those questions with some reference to what
sort of a person she was;
that she was somehow
especially worthy of Christ's attention, or by being especially
good, so that Jesus would notice.
We'd like to say
that something she did earned her points with God.
Not so! The story
has nothing whatever to say about her worthiness.
In fact, there was
lots about her to disdain:
--she is
a woman in a time when women are little trusted.
--she is
unaccompanied, which makes her a target.
--she is
a widow, which makes her personal and legal situation
very difficult.
Her efforts have not
brought her personal or financial success!
The only thing to
commend her to Jesus is her trust in God, and that too, we know,
is a gift from God.
Trust, exercised in
thanksgiving;
that is
what she is doing that day in the Temple, and Jesus commends it.
And in commending
it, he is also not commending those who put in large
sums without thankfulness, and without trust in God.
A congregation's
treasurer and Council are always concerned about the
practicalities of running the organization,
but Jesus is even
more concerned about the more important thing – what is is that
is going on in the hearts and minds and lives of those who give
the gifts.
--Are the 2 copper
coins given with thanksgiving?
--Are the bags of
gold given with reluctance, or out of duty only, or how one can
show-off in public?
The Finance
Committee is always tempted to say “We don't care, we just want
the money in order to pay the bills.”
But Jesus is more
concerned about the giver's heart.
As is so often the
case in these stories from the Gospels, we don't know what
happened next.
The evangelists have
taken the story just so far, and then we are to live out the
next part of the tale.
Another example of
this is the familiar story of the Prodigal Son.
The story ends
before we can find out if the older son, the one who
stayed home, finally realized how prodigal he was, how
distant he was from his father even though he was living right
there at home this whole time.
Will the older son
finally accept the invitation to enter the party?
Did he finally
receive the father's love?
Did he get in and
give himself to the party, finally hearing the father's
invitation to him with joy?
Similarly, today's
story of the woman in the Temple ends before we hear if those in
charge of receiving the offering were moved to thanksgiving to
God and to love and care for their neighbor, including the
unnamed woman.
The passage ends;
what was the response of the Temple authorities?
Did they take the
money and run?
Did they catch her
spirit of thanksgiving and also learn to live thankfully?
The Bible doesn't
tell us, and we infer that the Temple authorities did not
understand what Jesus was describing, and took no notice of the
poor woman and her gift.
It was, after all,
only 2 small copper coins.
The Bible does not
tell us, but rather challenges us to answer the question in our
day and its circumstances.
I'm thinking of
Bette McCrandall who visited us 2 months ago before her return
to Liberia.
Any who meet her can
sense her drive and determination, her commitment to the Lord
Jesus in the face of great obstacles.
And now we are in
the role of the Temple authorities.
What will we do?
Will we simply take
her offering of herself through many years of service,
or will we love and
care for her, financially and prayer-fully?
I asked Bette when
she was here if there was some tool that she would appreciate in
her work which we could provide for her.
She said yes and so
we were able to make arrangements for 26 sets of the large
laminated teaching charts for the Divine Drama Bible study to be
shipped from Minnesota here and added to the container being
sent to Liberia two weeks ago.
She will be able to
equip 26 persons with a tremendous visual aid to be evangelists
in that land where the church is growing rapidly.
And all of us can be
involved with financial gifts large or small toward her support.
All of us can name
her regularly in our prayers and encourage others to do so.
Bette's attitude of
trust and thankfulness can rub off onto us, and that would be a
good thing, indeed.
I came across the
experience of another congregation this week.
They had been
working on the problem of hunger in their town and regularly
used the custom of bringing their gifts for this purpose to the
large receiving basket at the front of the church, as we
sometimes do also.
They got tired, and
the offerings were declining.
Then one Sunday a
poorly-dressed woman joined in the procession to the altar, and
everyone was wondering what was going on.
Would she take
something out of the basket rather than putting something into
it?
When she reached the
front, she went to the rail and slowly knelt in prayer and then
painfully got up and returned to her seat.
She gave everything
she had, in thankfulness and trust .
I wonder how it was
received by that congregation?
I wonder if their
sense of thanksgiving to God was renewed by her example?
I wonder if their
love and care of neighbor expanded to include that woman?
What kind of people
are we, anyway?
Homo sapiens
is what the scientists have somewhat egotistically named us as a
species.
Homo sapiens,
which means “wise man”.
On the basis of what
we are discerning today, what we are to be is
Homo eucharisticus
=“thanks-giving man”
May that attitude
permeate every fiber of our being,
so that your mind
and heart and body and wallet all agree this day and always.
Homo eucharisticus,
“thanksgiving man”;
yes, may
that be us, now and always.
Amen.
|